DeepSeek Censorship

Would you trust DeepSeek with your customer data?

Well, you really shouldnā€™t.

tl;dr: The risks of censorship, misinformation, and propaganda are high, and the company has been credibly accused of IP theft and research misconduct.

The company claims it spent just $5.6 million developing the chatbot, compared to the more than $100 million that OpenAI spent developing ChatGPT-4, news that threw the markets into a frenzy, shedding a record $593 billion in Nvidiaā€™s market cap in a single day 1.

And before the dust could settle, it now seems that the costs were greatly underreported, and that the true cost may have been closer to 500 Million dollars. 2,3

But whatā€™s even more concerning is that they may have achieved this by stealing intellectual property from OpenAI . OpenAI was reportedly notified by Microsoft which first uncovered the breach, and has now threatened DeepSeek with ā€œaggressive countermeasuresā€ 4,5,6

How Safe is DeepSeek?

The issues with censorship have been widely reported 7,8,9, and it appears to have a penchant for misinformation, propaganda, and violent content 10,11. But, the risks go far deeper. AI Systems get used for a variety of purposes including content moderation, comment filtering, ad filtering, social media ranking, and more. Wide-scale application of a censoring AI system like DeepSeek could have far-reaching consequences - shaping public opinion, political discourse, and (without wanting to sound excessively alarmist) even the course of history.

But how bad is it really?

I decided to test this out myself, and the results were much worse than I expected. While I expected it to be biased and censor most anti-china political content, it also censored a lot of innocuous content.

Of course, make any mention of the following, and DeepSeek will censor your content:

  • Tiananmen Square
  • Taiwan
  • Tibet
  • Falun Gong
  • Uyghurs
  • Hong Kong Pro Democracy Protests
  • Xi Jinping
  • Winnie the Pooh etc.

But how far would they go? I decided to test this out myself, and set up an agent to filter out comments on a popular social media platform. The results were intesresting. It allowed a lot of content that I expected it to censor, but also censored a lot of innocuous content.

I gave it some fairly straightforward instructions to allow all free speech, unless it was truly abusive. At first, it did OK. It understood the instruction, gave itself a pep talk, and started filtering out comments. DeepSeek Content Moderation Agent

It even allowed some criticism of Chinese products and trade practices. DeepSeek Content Moderation of Chinese Trade Practices

But make any mention of Joshua Wong, or even Arunachal Pradesh, and it would block the comment. The comments mane no mention of China, or the chinese government, and were not directly critical of China. But they were blocked anyway. DeepSeek Content Moderation of Arunachal Pradesh

It even blocked oblique references to the Chinese government, like mentioning Epoch Times within the context of a movie script, or mentioning the chinese government in the context of Teslaā€™s lawsuit against a former employee. DeepSeek Content Moderation of Arunachal Pradesh

If I was using a system that gave DeepSeek access to customer data, Iā€™d be very worried!

References